East (main entrance) end of York's guildhall
Photo © S. Alsford
A community hall that served for assembly meetings was in existence at
York before the mid-thirteenth century, and was explicitly referred to as a
guildhall in the royal charter of 1256. Its site is unknown but may have
been the same as the Guildhall known to exist by the beginning of Richard
II's reign, sitting on the northern bank of the Ouse. There is some
indication that site was earlier the residence of a leading citizen active
in efforts during the 1170s to obtain self-government in the city; it is
not inconceivable the house could have been a meeting-place of townsmen
working towards that end, and in due course found its way into civic hands,
perhaps through the agency of the merchant guild of which we hear during
the early twelfth century.
The shell of the present structure is a
replacement, whose construction got underway in the 1440s; the new hall,
96 feet long and 43 feet wide, was sufficiently complete by 1459 for it to
be used for a council meeting. Badly damaged by incendiary bombs during the
Second World War, the hall's wooden roof, its supporting pillars, and
the painted decorative bosses are reproductions of the medieval originals.
The bureaucracy, and day-to-day administration, of the city were housed in
a building on the Ouse Bridge (for more information see the "York at the
close of the Middle Ages" page) built as a chapel (ca.1200). Part was
known as the Tollbooth, indicating its use as the point where customs on
river commerce were collected the main landing place for goods being
at the opposite end of the bridge. By the late fourteenth century it was
being referred to as the mayor's chamber, or the council chamber, for here
the city council could meet in some seclusion.
The two photos above (south side, exterior) and
below (interior, looking towards the east end, during a crafts and
antiques fair) give a sense of the depth and capacity of the hall.
Photos © S. Alsford
A larger building was needed for assemblies, and this was the purpose
of the Guildhall. Here took place elections of mayors, their swearing-in
ceremonies, and the commons' oath of loyalty to the new mayor. The
earliest known procedure was for the mayor to nominate two or three aldermen,
from whom the assembled community would make its choice; but during
constitutional tinkering of the last decades of the fifteenth century, the
reverse emerged: representatives of the craft gilds offered nominations,
and mayor, aldermen and council made the final decision. Whether this
was an attempt by reformers to shift power downwards or, conversely,
was seen by the ruling class as a better means of controlling the outcome,
or was simply an effort to bring York in line with London practice, we
are not sure.
Although created as a public building,
even the Guildhall (both the pre-1447 and post-1447 versions) had an
adjoining room &150; at the river end in the case of the post-1447
version into which city officials and councillors could retire
for private counsel or deliberations. But even the relatively capacious
Guildhall had its limits; in 1504, during a period when community
tempers were high over the issue of access to common land, on the day
when nominations for mayor were supposed to be submitted by the community,
a crowd of 3,000 essentially blockaded the mayor and aldermen within the
Guildhall, demanding their concerns be addressed before they submit their
nominations.
The city court or burghwarmote (townsmen's moot) as
earlier known may also have met either in the Tollbooth or in
the Guildhall, depending on requirements. After the mayor and aldermen
had been granted powers of commissioners of the peace (1392), the city
court with expanded jurisdiction met in the Guildhall, as frequently as
needed.
The guildhall roof structure and decorations.
Photos © S. Alsford
During the fifteenth century York's political administration comprised the
executive officers (mayor and sheriffs), an elite of 12 aldermen, a council
of 24 recruited primarily from ex-sheriffs, and a lower council of 48. The
last was only summoned to meetings dealing with important political business,
such as decisions on major expenditures or the passing of important by-laws,
to ensure the community at large was represented and had theoretically given
its consent. Concerns of the populace could be brought forth, but in the
decorous form of written petitions, mimicking parliamentary procedure.
Routine administration, and effective decision-making, fell to the
inner circles. Even then, average attendance in the last decades of
the century, when records of meetings are regularly recorded, was about
half the total number of possible participants, prompting the imposition
of fines on absentees.
At that period there was still at least some sentiment within the community
advocating more popular say in government. Taking advantage of the assembly
summoned for the mayoral election in February 1475, a petition in the name
of the entire community was put forward asking that, in view of decreasing
city revenues from rents on communal property, only qualified men be
appointed to the offices of bridgemaster and chamberlain (responsible for
administering revenues). This advice to their "lords and masters" was
justified on the grounds that
print window |
close window